Decompression models, algorithms, gradient factors, deep stops and dive computers.
Rethinking the hit
Author(s): Zaferes, Andrea
Year: 1997
A brief, readable discussion on how immune reactions might play a key role in what divers call “the hit.” The article suggests that it’s not just bubbles causing trouble, but also the body’s own inflammatory response that can turn a dive into a decompression incident.
Citation: Zaferes, A. (1997). Rethinking the hit. Immersed – The International Technical Diving Magazine, Spring 1997.
📥 Download
A study of decompression sickness using recorded depth-time profiles
Author(s): Dunford, R.G.
Year: 2020
This study analyzes recorded depth-time profiles from divers and compares them to reported decompression sickness cases, aiming to describe the relationship between real dive exposure patterns and observed DCS incidents.
Citation: Dunford MS, R. G., Denoble, P. D., Forbes, R. B., Pieper DrPh, C. F., Howle, L. E., Vann, R. D., America, D., & Carolina, N. U. (2020). A study of decompression sickness using recorded depth-time profiles (Vol. 47, Issue 1).
🔗 External link
Redistribution of Decompression Stop Time from Shallow to Deep Stops Increases Incidence of Decompression Sickness in Air Decompression Dives
Author(s): Doolette, David et al
Year: 2011
An experimental U.S. Navy study showing that shifting decompression time from shallow to deeper stops increased DCS incidence in controlled dives. This frequently cited and heavily debated work remains a key reference in discussions about “deep stop” strategies.
Citation: Doolette, D. J., Gerth, W. A., & Gault, K. A. (2011). Redistribution of Decompression stop time from shallow to deep stops increases incidence of decompression sickness in air decompression dives.
🔗 External link 📥 Download
Decompression from He-N2-O2 (Trimix) bounce dives is not more efficient than from He-O2 (Heliox) bounce dives.
Author(s): Doolette, David et al
Year: 2015
NEDU report comparing decompression efficiency between trimix and heliox bounce dives. Findings show no measurable advantage of adding nitrogen to helium-oxygen mixtures for decompression efficiency. Frequently cited in discussions on gas choice and decompression theory.
Citation: Doolette, D. J., Gault, K. A., & Gerth, W. A. (2015). Decompression from He-N2-O2 (Trimix) bounce dives is not more efficient than from He-O2 (Heliox) bounce dives.
🔗 External link 📥 Download
Dive Risk Factors, Gas Bubble Formation, and Decompression Illness in Recreational SCUBA Diving: Analysis of DAN Europe DSL Data Base
Author(s): Cialoni, Danilo et al
Year: 2017
Open-access study analyzing data from the DAN Europe Diving Safety Laboratory (DSL). It examines how various dive risk factors relate to post-dive venous gas bubble formation and decompression illness in recreational scuba diving.
Citation: Cialoni, D., Pieri, M., Balestra, C., & Marroni, A. (2017). Dive risk factors, Gas Bubble formation, and decompression illness in recreational SCUBA diving: Analysis of DAN Europe DSL data base. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(SEP).
🔗 External link
Recreational technical diving part 1: an introduction to technical diving methods and activities
Author(s): Mitchell, Simon J.; Doolette, David J.
Year: 2013
A compact introduction to technical diving: breathing gas mixtures, equipment configurations, and the planning and execution of deep, long dives. Written for physicians – ideal for putting tech diving into proper context.
Citation: Mitchell, S. J., & Doolette, D. J. (2013). Recreational technical diving part 1: an introduction to technical diving methods and activities. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, 43(2), 86–93. PMID: 23813462
🔗 External link
Recreational technical diving part 2: decompression from deep technical dives
Author(s): Doolette, David J.; Mitchell, Simon J.
Year: 2013
The evidence behind decompression practice in technical diving: many algorithm modifications are driven by anecdote. The authors test deep stops, gas switches and helium mixtures against the scientific data – essential reading for tech instructors.
Citation: Doolette, D. J., & Mitchell, S. J. (2013). Recreational technical diving part 2: decompression from deep technical dives. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, 43(2), 96–104. PMID: 23813463
🔗 External link
Selecting optimal air diving gradient factors for Belgian military divers: more conservative settings are not necessarily safer
Author(s): De Ridder, Sven et al.
Year: 2023
The Belgian Navy evaluated gradient factors for its dive computers. Key message: the common 30/70 setting produces deep first stops that load the slower tissues more – a low GF-low is not automatically safer. Symmetrical settings are recommended.
Citation: De Ridder, S., Pattyn, N., Neyt, X., & Germonpré, P. (2023). Selecting optimal air diving gradient factors for Belgian military divers: more conservative settings are not necessarily safer. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, 53(3), 251–258. doi: 10.28920/dhm53.3.251-258
🔗 External link
Extremely deep bounce dives: planning and physiological challenges based on the experiences of a sample of French-speaking technical divers
Author(s): Gouin, Emmanuel; Dugrenot, Emmanuel; Gardette, Bernard
Year: 2025
Interviews with eight divers who have gone deeper than 200 m. The biggest challenge was not HPNS but decompression. A rare insight into the planning and limits of extreme deep dives.
Citation: Gouin, E., Dugrenot, E., & Gardette, B. (2025). Extremely deep bounce dives: planning and physiological challenges based on the experiences of a sample of French-speaking technical divers. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, 55(2), 203–210. doi: 10.28920/dhm55.2.203-210
🔗 External link